On July 16, 2013, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued its decision in the Rock-Koshkonong Lake District v. DNR case. The decision is a significant victory for our Godfrey & Kahn clients and businesses, municipalities and property owners throughout the state. Godfrey & Kahn and the Wheeler, Van Sickle & Anderson law firms acted as co-counsel in this case on behalf of the Lake District and two business/recreation associations in the area. There were five amicus briefs filed in the case by Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce, the Wisconsin Realtors Association, and three environmental groups. Joanne Kloppenburg and Cynthia Hirsch of the Attorney General's office represented the Department of Natural Resources (DNR).Justice Prosser wrote the majority opinion and was joined by Justices Roggensack, Ziegler and Gableman. Justice Crooks wrote the dissenting opinion and was joined by Chief Justice Abrahamson and Justice Bradley.The most relevant part of the court's decision from the business and municipal perspectives was its discussion of the public trust doctrine and the relevance of economic testimony in water level cases for DNR decision-making on impounded lakes (there are over 2000 such lakes in Wisconsin). The majority agreed with our clients that the public trust doctrine does NOT extend beyond the ordinary high water mark nor extend to adjacent private, non-navigable wetlands. In reaching its decision the Supreme Court set significant parameters on the public trust doctrine, which will be very helpful going forward in protecting private property.Some of the excerpts from the majority decision rejecting DNR's and Department of Justice's (DOJ) attempt to greatly expand DNR's regulatory authority through the public trust doctrine include the following:
In addition to the public trust doctrine issue, the Supreme Court held that the DNR must consider the economic impacts on local businesses, municipalities and property owners on the lake when deciding whether to raise or lower water levels via a dam on the lake. DNR argued that it had no such duty.The Supreme Court ruled that the economic factors must be considered by the DNR and balanced with other relevant factors when making such a decision.Overall, this is a significant victory for our clients (the Lake Koshkonong Lake District and two business/recreation associations in the Lake Koshkonong area) as well as municipalities, businesses and property owners in Wisconsin.Please feel free to contact any member of the Godfrey & Kahn Environmental & Energies Strategies Team if you would like more information about this case.
January 8, 2021
January 7, 2021
December 30, 2020
Get practical insights on COVID-19 legal issues for your business.
Visit Resource Center
If you have a media request or need an attorney with particular knowledge for comment, please contact Kyle Mondy, Marketing & Communications Manager, at 414.287.9481 or kmondy@gklaw.com.
Subscribe today to receive firm newsletters and blogs, client updates, seminar announcements, and more according to your preferences and areas of interest.
For more information on this topic, or to learn how Godfrey & Kahn can help, contact our COVID-19 Response Team.
Disclaimer and Legal Notices
Copyright © 2020 Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.
Attorneys at Law - All rights reserved.
Client Login