Indian Nations Law Update - November 2013November 11, 2013
Why Not Pass a HEARTH Act for Rights of Way?
Last year, the federal government took important steps toward returning control of Indian lands to tribes by passing the “Helping Expedite and Advance Responsible Tribal Homeownership” (HEARTH) Act. The HEARTH Act amends the 1955 law governing Indian country leases to permit leasing of Indian lands without Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) approval by tribes that have adopted leasing laws that meet prescribed requirements.
The 2012 leasing reforms effectively modernize the federal trust doctrine by reducing paternalistic oversight based on outdated notions of tribal incompetence on the one hand, while increasing tribes’ rights of self-determination over their territories on the other. They also facilitate economic development by reducing bureaucratic delays.
The modernized trust principles underlying the new leasing laws should be extended to other areas of federal oversight including the 1948 all-purpose right of way law and the Part 169 BIA regulations. The Part 169 regulations provide the framework for BIA approvals of rights of way for roads, rail, telecommunications, oil and gas pipelines, electricity transmission, water and sewer lines and any other purpose requiring the right to cross tribal lands. Like the leasing regulations, the approval process includes an application, submission of information about the applicant, site maps, determination of fair market value, environmental protection provisions and mandatory terms.
Reform of the Indian country rights of way should follow the leasing reform model. The 1948 right of way law should be amended to permit tribes to adopt ordinances addressing rights of way, with appropriate valuation and environmental review provisions. Tribes that adopt conforming ordinances and obtain BIA approval would thereafter be free of the federal approval requirements. At the same time, regardless whether Congress amends the 1948 law, BIA should amend the Part 169 regulations to provide greater deference to, and less federal review of, tribal decisions relating to rights of way.
For a more detailed argument for right of way reform, see our article here.
Godfrey & Kahn to Present on Financing Renewable Energy at National American Indian Housing Council’s Annual Legal Symposium
Brian Pierson, leader of Godfrey & Kahn’s Indian Nations Law Practice Group, and John Clancy, leader of the firm’s Environmental & Renewable Energy Strategies Practice Group, will present “Financing Renewable Energy for Indian Housing” on Wednesday, December 11, 2013 from 10:45 a.m. - 12:15 p.m. at the Venetian in Las Vegas, as part of the National American Indian Housing Council’s (NAIHC) Annual Legal Symposium.
The presentation will describe strategies and financing sources to help tribes and Tribally Designated Housing Entities (TDHEs) achieve energy independence consistent with tribes’ Seven Generations tradition. We will describe how tribes and TDHEs can partner with developers to take advantage of federal investment tax credits and other tax benefits. We will discuss business structures and related leasing issues, including the HEARTH act and Wind and Solar Resources leases. We will explain how reduced energy costs and state and federal grants can cover additional portions of development costs. Finally, we will discuss development of generation facilities that can power both tribal enterprises and tribal housing and the permissible uses of the Indian Housing Block Grant and other financing sources in connection with such projects. We will illustrate recommended clean energy strategies with cases studies.
To register, visit NAIHC’s website here.
Godfrey & Kahn has extensive experience working with tribes to achieve energy independence and sustainability goals. For more information, contact Brian Pierson at 414.287.9456 or email@example.com.