Skip to Search
Skip to Main Content
Main Content

Bank Strategy Briefing

Bank Strategy Briefing: Do you have too much capital?

June 28, 2017

How much capital is too much capital? Your bank needs enough capital to support growth, absorb losses, and satisfy regulators; however, retaining too much capital can stifle shareholders’ return on equity and limit their ability to more efficiently invest their equity.

Your bank’s capital maintenance strategy should be specific to your bank’s situation. Some community banks have the luxury of holding a minimum amount of capital because they have ready access to additional capital should the need arise. Sources of capital for these banks tend to be the public markets (if the bank is a public company or poised to become one) or a wealthy ownership group and/or board.

For other banks without such ready access to capital, there is a need to more conservatively retain capital. However, even for these banks, there is a point at which excess capital levels create a need by the board and management to consider ways to actively manage them. Consider the following breakdown of risk-based capital ratios1 and corresponding average ROEs at community banks in Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin:

The foregoing analysis indicates that some community banks may have significant amounts of excess capital and that—not surprisingly—ROE is being impacted as a result. We recommend that community bank boards analyze their capital position. If it is determined that a substantial amount of excess capital exists, the board should consider developing a plan to either deploy that capital into earning assets (via organic growth or acquisition) or, if appropriate, return some of it to shareholders. 

If excess capital will not be deployed as part of a growth strategy, here are three methods by which your board can return excess capital to shareholders, along with some of the advantages and disadvantages of each:

Strategy Advantages Disadvantages
Special Dividend
  • Provides liquidity.
  • Easy to declare and administer.
  • Inexpensive from a cost perspective.
  • No mechanism to allow shareholders to choose whether to participate.
Tender Offer
  • Allows shareholders to choose to participate or not.
  • Liquidity for sellers.
  • Improves EPS/Accretive to holders.
  • More formal process that often yields a greater shareholder response.
  • Artificial market in shares.
  • More expensive from a cost perspective.
  • Risk of more demand than expected.
Share Repurchase Plan
  • Allows shareholders to choose to participate or not.
  • Liquidity for sellers.
  • Improves EPS/Accretive to holders.
  • Inexpensive from a cost perspective.
  • Artificial market in shares.
  • Can create an ongoing expectation of liquidity from shareholders.
  • Risk of more demand than expected.

If your community bank has excess capital, have a discussion at your next board meeting about what options may be available to provide the greatest value to your shareholders.

1 Numbers are as of March 31, 2017. Risk-based capital is used for illustrative purposes only, and banks need to monitor all regulatory capital ratios.

Related Attorneys

Media Contact 

If you have a media request or need an attorney with particular knowledge for comment, please contact Kyle Mondy, Marketing & Communications Manager, at 414.287.9481 or


Subscribe today to receive firm newsletters and blogs, client updates, seminar announcements, and more according to your preferences and areas of interest.

Disclaimer and Legal Notices

Copyright © 2023 Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.

Attorneys at Law - All rights reserved.


Client Login